While 2026, the 50th anniversary, is a very important date in the institutional history of the Dixon Gallery and Gardens, 1986 was also significant. That year the museum opened a large addition to the museum complex which included the Catmur Foyer, the auditorium, and Plough Gallery. Two other changes also occurred that year. Herbert Rhea became the chairman of the museum board, succeeding the first chairman and personal friend and colleague of Hugo Dixon, Eric Catmur. That year also saw a new director come to Memphis, John Buchanan. Part of a new generation of museum professionals, the young Buchanan and his wife Lucy would shake up older supporters of the Dixon and create a whole new enthusiasm for art in Memphis. He did this by bringing a whole “crowd” of blockbuster exhibitions to the Dixon in the next decade. Those exhibitions also brought me to the museum in1987.
The city of Memphis had gotten involved in the arts in that decade too. In a collaboration with the Egyptian government , the University. Of Memphis and the Memphis Brooks Museum , the city staged a huge exhibition of Egyptian antiquities in 1987: Rameses the Great. Held at the Cook Convention Center, the show utilized almost 1,000 volunteers from all over the Mid-South. Those volunteers were recruited and coordinated by two women’s organizations in Memphis, the Junior League and the National Council of Jewish Women. I was an active member of the Junior League and with one sustainer, Julie Walters Raines, we became the chairmen of the project. At the time it was the largest volunteer effort ever in the Volunteer state, and by the end of that summer, Julie and I had become (by accident) the experts on voluntarism in Memphis.
And while at that point, I had never met the Buchanans, I did know the museum’s assistant director, Katherine Lawrence. We had first met when I was a volunteer docent at the Dixon in the early 1980s. Later we crossed paths in the JLM. And when the Rameses show was preparing to close, she called me and asked me to come to the Dixon, meet the new director, and advise them about volunteer recruitment. At that point John had already lined up a large exhibition of Rodin sculpture, part of the Gerald and Iris Cantor collection, set to open in 1988. He and Lucy knew the value of reliable energetic volunteers because of the time they spent at the National Gallery in Washington, DC. At the end of the meeting, they asked me if I knew anyone at the city show who might like to organize a volunteer program, as an employee at the Dixon. I decided it was “ now or never”, so I told them I would be interested, if we could work out the details that involved my husband, who had just started a new job, and two children, then aged seven and four. Three weeks later I began working a four day 20 hour week.
It was a small gallery staff of only a dozen people and with one exception, we were all under forty. There was only one computer for the whole complex that Lucy utilized for membership and development. I guess if we had known better or if we had been older, we would never have agreed to unexpectedly mount a major exhibition of the Armand Hammer art collection with only 30 days notice. Instead of having six months to recruit and train volunteers for Rodin, I had 30 days to get ready for Dr. Hammer.. Rameses had awakened the general public to art, and Hammer and the Dixon was the next big thing. JB said it was then or never for Hammer’s art, and he(typically) was sure it was possible. We were to be the very last venue for a collection that had travelled all over the world for for 10 years. (Ironically, the Brooks had been the very first place the collection was shown back in 1969, in the shadow of Martin Luther King’s assassination the previous year.) Today the art can be seen at the Hammer Museum in Los Angeles
We opened in mid November with a visit from an elderly Dr. Hammer himself for the opening festivities. The show included old master drawings, and many fine examples of familiar “big names” in the art history catalogue. Four that I particularly recall as popular with our audience were Rembrandt’s Juno, Ruben’s Adoration of the Shepherds, Sargent’s life size portrait Dr. Pozzi. and several works by the always popular Vincent Van Gogh. Two other works by a 19th century American and a British painter were unexpectedly “big”, a peasant painting by Daniel Ridgeway Knight and John Everett Millais Caller Herrin. On weekends the galleries were sometimes so crowded that we had to control the number of visitors in the smaller spaces.
Another change we had to make was with admissions. Until that show, admissions had been taken at the gate house on Park Avenue (since demolished). One day of long lines on Park, convinced Buchanan that we would in future move admissions to the Catmur Foyer for special exhibitions. We also( maybe for the first time) charged a special admission price for the general public. Another innovation was we stayed open late on Thursday nights to accommodate working people and a younger audience. The show closed on New Years Eve or the Sunday following. John had promised the visitors that if they were in line for admission at 5pm that day, we wouldn’t close until everyone had seen the exhibition. I remember looking out of the doorway in the Catmur and the line stretched back beyond the circle driveway in front of the museum. I think we stayed open till 9:00 that night. The Dixon saw about 40,000 people during the Hammer show; it was the first of a number of ” blockbusters” that Buchanan organized for the Dixon. For the staff it showed what we would need for future exhibitions and it forged us together for the next few years. Another vital part of the success was Herbert Rhea whose support for the museum , business acumen, and ties to the community helped fund these projects. The museum would see 60,000 people for Rodin in1988, and Toulouse-Lautrec set a record of 66,000 in six weeks that I believe even holds today. For me it opened a new career in the arts which I have enjoyed ever since, whoever is in charge, but there will always be a special bond for me with the “Dynamic Duo. “. The twosome was young, dynamic, meticulous, ambitious, funny and exhausting, and I wouldn’t have missed working with them.